Cit vs surinder pal anand
WebAfter relying upon a judgment of this Court in CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand (2010) 48 DTR 135 (P&H), the Commissioner allowed the assessee's appeal and ordered deletion of the amount of Rs. 18,31,500/- as ordered to be added to his income by the assessing officer. WebJan 8, 2024 · The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264 held that once under special provision of section 44AD …
Cit vs surinder pal anand
Did you know?
WebSep 19, 2024 · The Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows’.-“7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. Sub-section (1) of section 44AD clearly provides that where an assessce is engaged in the business of civil ... WebThe CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of initial payment of installment of vend allotted, initial investment in the infrastructure in purchase of …
WebSurinder Pal Anand, 242 CTR 61(P&H). 6. Ld D.R. on the other hand, relied on the order of the CIT(A). 7. of lower authorities and materials available on record. In the instant case, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee has made cash deposit of ₹20,67,668/- … WebSep 19, 2024 · Punjab and Haryana High court distinguished and overruled its own decision in CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand 48 DTR 135 in which cash deposited in bank was held from business itself.
Webdecision of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand 192 Taxmann 264 and submitted that once the return of income is filed U/s 44AD of the Act, the turnover declared by the assessee cannot be doubted. The assessee is not required to explain each WebJan 30, 2024 · i) CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264 (P&H HC) ii) Nand Lal Popli vs. DCIT [ITA1161&1162/Chd/2013 dt. 14/06/2016] Accordingly the addition of Rs. 27,94,306/- u/s. 68/69A was directed to be deleted. The view full text of the judgment: Click here --------------------------------- Summarized by: CA. Shashank A. Mehta
WebThe Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows'.- 8 I.T.A. No. 451/Coch/2024 "7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994.
Web(hereinafter referred as Ld. Pr. CIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (herein after refered as the Act). 2. The facts in brief are that the assessee filed return of income of Rs. 1,44,320/- by computing income u/s 44AD of the Act. The case of the assessee was taken up for scrutiny and the ld AO made an addition of Rs. cupcake and wine tastingWebSep 13, 2024 · Surinder Pal Anand (2010) 192 Taxman 264 (P&H ) The assessee filed his return of income showing certain business income under section 44AD. The Assessing Officer did not accept the return and made an addition in respect of the cash deposited in the bank account during the year. cupcake and things bakery kapoleiWebCIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), had held as follows:- “7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. Sub-section (1) of section 44AD clearly provides that where an assessee is engaged in the business of civil construction or supply easy bracelet attachmentsWebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs P.V.Kalyanasundaram on 8 February, 2006. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08/02/2006 Coram THE … easybpyWebJul 4, 2024 · Hon'ble bench relied on the preposition laid by Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in case of CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 Taxman 264, wherein in Para 8 … easy boys face paintcupcake atm how does it workWeb% - 0 0 0 ) - % +% ! + = >> : 0 % ! 0 ! ... 9 ! + % 0 % ( ( )2 0 + ( 0 )- 0 %- % 0 easy boys